technologyisnatural

- friends
267 link karma
3,377 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Two-Year Club

    Verified Email

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

TIL that thorium is more abundant and cleaner than uranium and could be used in nuclear power plants. by worthwhileredditingin todayilearned

[–]technologyisnatural 7 points8 points ago

No need to apologize for Thorium advocacy :D

One nuance: Thorium and Uranium are about equally abundant in the Earth's crust, but the fraction of Uranium that's usable for nuclear energy is tiny (and requires high speed centrifuges, etc, to obtain).

Immortal Avatar: Russian project seeks to create robot with human brain by psYberspRe4Ddin worldnews

[–]technologyisnatural 0 points1 point ago

Further liberation from constraints. A chance to see the future.

US Imposes Stiff New Tariffs on Solar Panels Made in China - Investigation finds China kept prices low with subsidies, but some in US warn tariff will slow adoption of solar energy by anutensilin energy

[–]technologyisnatural 5 points6 points ago

It's comically ineffective and yet may just spark a trade war that gives us another decade of recession. The very best outcome is that China basically ignores the action, and the US effectively adds a 6-12% tax on solar panel buyers which funds factories in Taiwan. Enormous downside risk for no upside.

US Imposes Stiff New Tariffs on Solar Panels Made in China - Investigation finds China kept prices low with subsidies, but some in US warn tariff will slow adoption of solar energy by anutensilin energy

[–]technologyisnatural 4 points5 points ago

This is the more interesting article. The actual result of the 35% tariff (which would put the units at parity with US firms) will be to shift production off the mainland to Taiwan causing an estimated 6-12% increase in price.

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 1 point2 points ago

lol. You've totally lost it. We'll talk another day when you've calmed down.

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 3 points4 points ago

I think moirende is justified in requiring that asking that an alleged cloud model actually have some relationship to reality. Unfortunately, "not a single [so-called] model has a statistically significant agreement with the observational datasets."

Effectively, they are all cloudiness fudge factors.

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 3 points4 points ago

So you admit that water vapor level and cloud formation are related, so now you have to argue that water vapor level is not related to water vapor feedback or that cloud formation is not related to cloud feedback.

Your rigidmindedness has betrayed you. It is not entirely your fault. You are just the standard flawed product of the rote memorization of dogma that currently passes for climate science.

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 6 points7 points ago

Do you really believe that the level of water vapor in the atmosphere and cloud formation are "entirely separate topics"?

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 4 points5 points ago

An arbitrary cloud_fudge_factor variable "to make things work" doesn't count.

"Global Warming Skeptics Point to Clouds" in the NYTimes by jr_floodin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 3 points4 points ago

Why isn't the headline: "It is the year 2012, but so-called climate models still don't include clouds!" ?

Der Spiegel Reports On Germany’s “Setting Sun” – The Collapse Of The Solar Industry by ManBearPiggin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 5 points6 points ago

I love how there's this air of mystery around the question of how the massive subsidies resulted in such ruinous government expenditures. Do they not have spreadsheets in Germany?

A Critique Of The Broken-Record Counterfactual Message of The New York Times On Environmentalists and Scientists by ItsJustAConspiracyin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 2 points3 points ago

When you are attacking the New York Times for being insufficiently alarmist, you really might want to rethink your position.

Can an Algorithm Write a Better News Story Than a Human Reporter? by marquis_of_chaosin Foodforthought

[–]technologyisnatural 0 points1 point ago

It makes me happy that meta-author is now a job.

I fucked up. by XHVin self

[–]technologyisnatural 0 points1 point ago

So I shouldn't use a lawyer from Legal Aid? (Free lawyers).

Almost certainly not. They are better than no lawyer, but they don't have time to do more than the basics. You want to try to end up with a clean record. There's usually some sort of program for first time offenders. If you really have to use a free lawyer, make sure they like you. Be charming.

I'll give all the money I have in the world to my parents and home they can pay some as well, but I don't think it'll tally up to $40,000.

It might be less in Canada, but the point is: think about borrowing the money. It will suck, but it will suck a whole lot less than working in minimum wage jobs for the rest of your life because of a criminal record. You fucked up. Fucking up is expensive. Life lesson learned.

I've never been arrested before so I don't know the process.

This means you have a chance. Don't waste it.

The other stuff you'll have to ask your lawyer. It can really depend on the judge. I know you just want it to be over, but don't think like that. Take the attitude that you will fight for as long as it takes. The path of least resistance will not be to your advantage.

I fucked up. by XHVin self

[–]technologyisnatural 4 points5 points ago

Spend a lot of money on a good lawyer. Like $40,000. Promise anything to stay out of prison and have a shot at cleaning up your record. Don't plea guilty just because it is easier for the freebie lawyer. In 10 years time you won't care about the $40,000, but you will care about a criminal record. Try to find out who your judge is going to be. Try to find lawyers who personally know the judge.

Don't pretend this is going to go away. Spend every waking moment between now and the court date working to get the minimum punishment. You'll need character witnesses. Have you ever done anything charitable? Do any of your teachers like you? Dump your pride and rally support. You are going to need it.

Wacky weather shifting voters away from GOP's climate stance by fungussain climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural 2 points3 points ago

Weather = climate whenever it suits the alarmist agenda! They give up all pretense of objectivity and wonder why people are losing their climate religion.

Could the growth of computing power of meatspace be enough to bring on a singularity-like event? by kurtgodelisdeadin singularity

[–]technologyisnatural 2 points3 points ago

Natural intelligence augmentation is definitely the way forward right now.

James Lovelock Finally Walks Back His Absurd Doomism, But He Still Doesn't Follow Climate Science by ItsJustAConspiracyin climateskeptics

[–]technologyisnatural -1 points0 points ago

Finally upped his medication enough so that he can think straight. Wish they'd do the same for Hansen.

Peak Oil Off: Great Game On by glmoryin energy

[–]technologyisnatural 1 point2 points ago

Oil's salient feature is (or, at least was) its high EROI - energy returned or made available per unit of energy invested to achieve that. At first, you would just stick a pipe in the ground and the stuff would gush out under pressure. The EROI was 10000%. The energy profit was used to build the modern world. Fossil fuel EROIs for new projects (deep water, tar sands) are now in the 200-300% range, and they are only going to head lower (on average over total production). At some point we aren't going to be able to sustain modern society. People joke that that's just fine with them, but really it's a horror (lack of cheap fertilizer = mass starvation), particularly since it is avoidable.

Fission and fusion are our main hope for returns to high EROI. Renewables are worthless in this respect, which is probably why the neo-luddites love them. Fusion appears to be a pipe dream. Uranium based fission gives us a couple of hundred years before we hit "peak Uranium", but Thorium based fission gives us millenia (the amount of Thorium appears similar to the amount of Uranium until you realize that we can only use a tiny fraction of naturally occurring Uranium).

Once you have high EROI you can do stupid things like suck CO2 out of the air and turn it back into liquid fuel if you really want to. But without high EROI, the Malthusians just might get to say "I told you so."

Is being paid on a "per hour" basis unfair towards people who work through tasks faster and complete more work for the same pay? by ninjaoin InsightfulQuestions

[–]technologyisnatural 18 points19 points ago*

For work of the same quality, the more productive worker should demand a higher rate of pay. The problem arises in measuring product quality.

Peak Oil Off: Great Game On by glmoryin energy

[–]technologyisnatural 1 point2 points ago

Yep. A couple of gigabarrels of oil just isn't going to make a difference. We are right on track for peak production this decade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GrowingGap.jpg

Then prices will rise forever. We so need to get our Thorium game on.

It's Time To Re-Establish That If A Patent Blocks Progress, It's Unconstitutional by nomdewebin cyberlaws

[–]technologyisnatural -1 points0 points ago

Outsource patent examination to lawfirms at market rates and patent problems will end.

view more: next