AlyssaMoore

- friends
22,023 link karma
3,180 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

Top Scientists Vent on NASA’s Sub Prime Greenhouse Gas Hoaxer by scpg02in climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore -3 points-2 points ago

That johnosullivan guy

"Legal analyst and science writer, John O’Sullivan is co-founder and coordinator of Principia Scientific International (PSI) and co-author and instigator of ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory,’ the world’s first full-volume refutation of the cornerstone of man-made global warming science.

O’Sullivan was born in Berkshire, England, of immigrant Irish parents in 1961. As an accredited academic, John taught and lectured for over twenty years at schools and colleges in the east of England as well as successfully litigating for over a decade in the New York State courts and U.S. federal 2nd circuit.

As an analytical commentator John O’Sullivan has published over 150 major articles worldwide. As a direct consequence of controversial revelations in his ‘Satellite-gate’ article the U.S. Government swiftly removed a degraded orbital space satellite from service. His work features in the U.S. in ‘National Review,’ as well as in ‘China Daily,’ the Number One English portal in China, and ‘India Times,’ the prime source of business news in India.

John acts as legal consultant to Canada’s most prominent climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball, who is currently defending libel suits in the British Columbia Supreme Court against fellow climate researchers, Dr. Michael Mann and Dr. Andrew Weaver."

http://johnosullivan.wordpress.com/about/

Report: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm by Poptechin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 1 point2 points ago

Oh, so you now answer for AlyssaMoore? Is that just a pseudonym behind which we find the Poptech guy?

Wow! You global warming alarmism activists sure do love your paranoid conspiracy theories! No, I am not 'Poptech'.

If any skeptics of the catastrophic man-made global warming theory wish to respond to the trolls for me when I am away, please feel free to do so.

April 2012: Earth's 5th Warmest On Record And La Niña Officially Ends, So The Heat Is On. by ItsJustAConspiracyin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 0 points1 point ago

Weather does not equal climate.

Thinkprogress.org is a website that is funded by the global warming alarmist billionaire George Soros:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

Report: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm by Poptechin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 5 points6 points ago

you are just some Heartland operative

Unless you are a very good stalker, you don't know anything about me.

You are just another global warming alarmist troll who thinks that all skeptics work for "evil" Big Oil, right?

You are probably not paid by Greenpeace or the alarmist billionaire George Soros to troll /r/climateskeptics. You probably actually believe the predictions made in Al Gore's propaganda film "An Inconvenient Truth".

I don't get paid to submit a few articles that are skeptical of the catastrophic man-made global warming theory.

I do it because I am skeptical of the claims and predictions of the global warming alarmists.

Report: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm by Poptechin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 4 points5 points ago

LOL at your link to greenfyre's website!

The truth about 'greenfyre':

'Greenfyre is the Internet blog and screen name for a radical environmental activist, Mike Kaulbars from Ottawa, Canada. He is a founder of the Earth First! chapter in Ottawa, Canada, an eco-terrorist organization with a long history of violence and sabotage.'

"My experience is that many people are impressed and supportive of the radical militant actions that we do. ...I make no secret of my militant activism, arrests etc; [...]

...we do break the law. [...]

In a few weeks I, and 50 others are off to jail. ...I do what I do because of a "pure, true love for the Earth."

http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/truth-about-greenfyre.html

The question put to Dr. Mann at Disneyland today by float_flowin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 3 points4 points ago

good science

"Yet Michael Mann's studies were deeply flawed. Omit one or two proxies, for example, and the scary warming 'spike' disappears. Mann's model could produce hockey stick shapes using random data, such as baseball scores, or red noise. Critics alleged that Mann's choices of data and statistical tools all cooled the Medieval Warm Period, and emphasised late 20th Century warming."

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/08/andrew_montford_interview/

Chronology: CRU’s Yamal Deception:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/09/chronology-the-yamal-deception/

'Who to believe on climate? Heartland.... or EVERY national scientific academy in the world?' by fungussain climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 2 points3 points ago

Facts about the “Forecast the Facts” campaign – they’re just another paid mouthpiece of the Center for American Progress

'I’ve talked about the slimy “Forecast the Facts” campaign before, where they are attempting to label your local TV weatherperson/meteorologist as a “denier” and pressure TV station management into making that person “toe the line” by having a bunch of fake form letters sent by “local viewers”. It is simply paid astroturfing.'

. . .

'Political is right, because today, those flailing PR geniuses at The Center for American Progress aka Think Progress, a front organization for all things left and “progressive” with a now $30 million+ annual budget (From 2008: CAP, which has 180 staffers and a $27 million budget, devotes as much as half of its resources to promoting its ideas through blogs, events, publications and media outreach. Source: Bloomberg ) let it slip (whether by design or accident we don’t know) that THEY are behind this “Forecast The Facts” outfit.'

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04/16/facts-about-the-forecast-the-facts-campaign-theyre-just-another-mouthpiece-of-the-center-for-american-progress/

Forecastthefacts.org is a George Soros funded activist website:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/01/22/forecastthefacts-org-political-activists-gagging-our-tv-meteorologists-on-climate-issues/

Richard Madeley reveals that the green blight has finally sunk Cornwall by ManBearPiggin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 2 points3 points ago

outstanding natural beauty

Too bad that it has been ruined by the thousands of monstrous wind turbines covering the land.

Nazi greens - An Inconvenient History by kokeyin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 2 points3 points ago

I take it that you decided to not read the article?

Here are the last few paragraphs:

'How can anyone read the Nazi Heidegger, or the writers of the Volk movement, or indeed Mein Kampf, and say, with a straight face, that environmentalism started with Rachel Carson? The Nazi Martin Heidegger is to the tips of his fingers, a romantic anti-capitalist. He is, to the toes of his fascist jack-boots, an environmentalist.

Should we be at all worried about any of this? After all, modern environmentalism, to many people, seems so innocent. But in the words of Bruggemeier, Cioc and Zeller (editors of How Green Were the Nazis?), ‘The green policies of the Nazis were more than a mere episode or aberration in environmental history at large. They point to larger meanings and demonstrate with brutal clarity that conservationism and environmentalism are not and have never been value-free or inherently benign enterprises.’ We should heed the warning of Lukács, that, ‘fascist demagogy and tyranny was only the ultimate culmination of a long process which initially had an “innocent” look’.

Green thinking was not a side-line for the Nazis. The idealisation of nature and the organic, the nostalgia for the Middle Ages, the anti-capitalism, the hatred of bankers, the hatred of cities and industry, the idealisation of peasant life … all this defined their poisonous ideology. It was the green attempt of the Nazis to recreate a peasant society which led them to invade Poland in search of ‘living space’. It was their green nostalgia for the Middle Ages which led to their ‘blood and soil’ racist ideology. It was their green anti-capitalism and loathing of bankers which led them to hate Jewish people. It was their green rejection of the Judeo-Christian tradition and of the Enlightenment and its humanist values, and their green return to pagan animal-worship - their idealisation of pre-civilised barbarism as more ‘authentic’ - that led to them to treat humans as worthless creatures with no more claim on our sympathies than viruses and pests. Green ideology was at the core of National Socialism. When we wonder what diseased thinking could motivate people to turn on the gas taps at Auschwitz, this is where we must look.'

It's a fairly long article and very interesting. But you can go ahead and use "Godwin's Law" as your excuse for not reading it.

Giving The Global Warming Bully A Free Pass: Warmist Joe Romm compared skeptics to Holocaust deniers by AlyssaMoorein climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore[S] 1 point2 points ago

It's very telling that 3 global warming alarmists upvoted him, according to Reddit Enhancement Suite.

Estimating TCR from recent warming « Isaac Held's Blog by Will_Powerin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 2 points3 points ago

The tone of the discourse is indeed impressive :(

Maybe you should report kokey to the moderator of /r/climateskeptics!

Heartland: Stop using Arthur Robinson's Trick to Hide the Incline with Fabricated Temperature Data by ItsJustAConspiracyin climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 5 points6 points ago

That's one of my favorite books. I think it's about time for me to read it again.

Game Over for the Climate - NYTimes.com by Icantevenhavemynamein climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 0 points1 point ago

This New York Times article has already been submitted to /r/climateskeptics by the global warming alarmist 'ItsJustAConspiracy':

http://www.reddit.com/r/climateskeptics/comments/th7u8/game_over_for_the_climate/

Hansen’s ‘Game Over for the Climate’ op-ed:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/10/hansens-game-over-for-the-climate-op-ed/

Snow in mid-May as forecasters warn of possible summer washout by Kim147in climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore -1 points0 points ago

1975 New York Times: "Climate Changes Called Ominous,", June 19, 1975 - Excerpt: “The most drastic potential change considered in the new report is an abrupt end to the present interglacial period of relative warmth that governed the planet's climate for the past 10,000 years. [...] The report also noted that periods of benign climate comparable to the present are unusual and have existed for about 8 percent of the last 700,000 years.”

1974 New York Times: "Climate Changes Endanger World's Food Output,", August 8, 1974 – Excerpt: A recent meeting of climate experts in Bonn, West Germany, produced the unanimous conclusion that the change in global weather patterns pose a severe threat to agriculture that could lead to major crop failures and mass starvation. [...] The drop [in global temps] since the 1940s has only been half a degree, but some scientists believe this is enough to trigger changes that could have important effects on the world's weather and agriculture.

1975 New York Times: "Scientists Ask Why World Climate is Changing, Major Cooling May Be Ahead", May 21, 1975 – Excerpt: Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered inevitable. Hints that is may already begun are evident. The drop in mean temperatures since 1950 in the Northern Hemisphere has been sufficient, for example, to shorten Britain's growing season for crops by two weeks.

1974 Time Magazine: "Another Ice Age," June 24, 1974 - Excerpt: However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age. [...] Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. The University of Wisconsin's Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth. [...] Whatever the cause of the cooling trend, its effects could be extremely serious, if not catastrophic. Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years.

Snow in mid-May as forecasters warn of possible summer washout by Kim147in climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 0 points1 point ago

global cooling scare

Despite many claims to the contrary, the 1970's global cooling fears were widespread among many scientists and in the media. Despite the fact that there was no UN IPCC organization created to promote global cooling in the 1970s and despite the fact that there was nowhere near the tens of billions of dollars in funding spent today to promote man-made global warming, fears of a coming ice age showed up in peer-reviewed literature, at scientific conferences, voiced by prominent scientists and throughout the media.

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3213/Dont-Miss-it-Climate-Depots-Factsheet-on-1970s-Coming-Ice-Age-Claims

RealClimate recognized as contributing to a high class of skeptics questioning the consensus. (borehole comments Gavin does not want people to read.) by butch123in climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 2 points3 points ago

It looks like the alarmists' website RealClimate.org just takes every skeptical comment and hides them in a catch-all thread called "The Bore Hole".

""I wanted you guys to know that you're free to use RC in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through, ...We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you'd like us to include.

Think of RC as a resource that is at your disposal... We'll use our best discretion to make sure the skeptics don't get to use the RC comments as a megaphone."

  • Michael E. Mann, IPCC Lead Author (2001)

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/07/truth-about-realclimateorg.html

Heartland loses six to a new group that will not promote climate change skepticism by fungussain climateskeptics

[–]AlyssaMoore 0 points1 point ago

From the article:

'I asked Heartland spokesman Jim Lakely if he disagreed with the "skeptic" charge. "The Heartland Institute doesn’t ‘deny’ climate change," he said. "The climate is always changing. Heartland does, however, promote the work of many scientists whose research shows human activity is not having a catastrophic warming effect on the planet. The computer models upon which the United Nations’ IPCC and other climate alarmists have relied for decades don’t match observable data."'

view more: next