5,365 word article that amounts to "Squirrel!", yes.

Again, the massive focus on the provenance of a fake document. Fascinating stuff I'm sure, apart from all the handwaving and conjecture - but changes nothing? The meat is elsewhere. Still doesn't change that we now know a completely anonymous donor specifically paid the authors and scientists of the NIPCC report via Heartland for producing exactly the desired output, or that they were arranging an educational curriculum with someone that believes that existing teaching materials are full of "CAGW propaganda".